Tutorial � neuro III, Iles, parallel visual processing

Greg Detre

29/10/01

 

pre-striate � higher than V1 (= extra-striate)

retina = part of the brain

parvo/magno distinction works up until the LGN (konio = hidden (Gk)???, dust???)

distinguish by cell body size in LGN

so we can label retinal ganglion cells M/P

M (parasol) � transient, achromatic, PA, larger RF

P � both fairly homologous

K � some have circular RFs, but antagonistic inputs from short and long wavelength RF, colour opponent

highly heterogenous � in cat, With cells with large RF and very sluggish � some K cells are a bit like that

Hubel + Livingstone � thought that P/M stayed highly segregated in V1 � argued that they remained separate - wrong

actualliy much convergence, even in V1

K blob, with P colour cells

lots of parallelism within the two streams

ODLs + visual field

off-centre-onsurround plus opposite in LGN

comes 2 bipolar cells, one to each

both looking for edges, but opposite sides

you need that duplication because otherwise they couldn't signal local reductions if they�re already firing at low frequency, hence their complements

needs to be linear(sic???) because of huge range of intensities

 

2 eyes, rods + cones

10% project to the midbrain

= a large role in insectivores and non-mammals � don't have a cortical visual system at all

midbrain vis systems seems to worry mainly about (stereo) eye movements

blindsight � believed to be midbrain feeding into visual system

comes from V1 lesion

from midbraint o perirhinal + dorsal (???)

 

IT system � V4

lesions achromatopsia

Holms(???) � viewed V1 as overly central � ignored parallelism + processing like motion blindness and achromatopsia etc.

distinguish between colour and wavelength

monkey cortex has cells that respond to colour, but colour constancy differentiates colour + wavelength

averaging mechanism � sample object, compare with the rest of the scene, and subtract average environment ambient light

factors out the nature of illumination � Helmholz

some cells respond to shapes and their mirror images

some are independent of viewpoint, some only from certain viewpoints

mirror images might be easy to do

cells that respond to faes � Rolls + Perez � seems respectable

hand responsive cells in monkeys too

fMRI � fusiform gyrus active when looking at faces (this month�s �Brain�) � autistic kids don't become active here

as though they don't have the right face sensitive area

�Face processing outside the fusiform� - Pierce

 

combingin shapes and colours (Zeki) � Monet vs Picasso

false colour art does not activate the same areas

Brain 121(???) Zeki fMRI � three(???) stages of colour processing

normal colours activated (as well as V1 V4) elsewhere

 

binding � central oscillations, correlated firings of neurons across wide areas of brain

indicating that they�re processing the same object/part of the visual field

is there a binding problem?

also, even the streams are cross-connected

mnemonist � is my memory degrading or actively erased?

 

Questions

S/M/L

oscillation binding vs temporal synchronicity

scotoma � blind area(???)

 

typing vs writing

when you write, the shapes are organised at a very high level and then interpreted at a lower level in terms of motor patterns

writing signature on a blackboard or with chalk � still looks the same independent of muscle groups

typing might be organised differently

writing = formulating an output pattern at a higher level

why?? because we learn to write earlier???

keyboard = position, writing = form